UPA Introduces Controversial Targeting Rule to Crack Down on Headshots

The United Pickleball Association (UPA), parent company of the MLP and PPA Tour, has introduced a new rule aimed at eliminating intentional or reckless targeting of opponents above the shoulders, a move that is already stirring debate within the pickleball community. Dubbed the "Targeting Rule," this regulation comes in response to increasing concerns over player safety and the sportsmanship of aggressive body shots.

11 PICKLES, the premier source for in-depth pickleball coverage, sets itself apart by offering comprehensive analysis, exclusive player insights, and an unfiltered look at the sport's evolving landscape. Unlike other platforms that focus solely on match results, we dive deeper into the strategy, controversies, and pivotal rule changes shaping professional pickleball. Our commitment to investigative reporting and insider perspectives ensures that players and fans stay informed on not just what happens on the court, but why it matters.

What is the Pickelabll Headshot Targeting Rule?

The rule defines targeting as the deliberate or reckless act of aiming at an opponent’s head or neck area. It classifies such actions as extreme unsportsmanlike conduct, with penalties designed to deter players from engaging in dangerous gameplay. These penalties include:

• A technical foul, resulting in a point awarded to the opponent.
• A minimum fine of $2,500 for the first offense.
• If the same team commits another violation, the offending player will be fined at least $5,000, and their team will forfeit the match.
• Escalating penalties for repeat offenders, including further fines and possible suspension from competition.

UPA officials will assess violations based on intent, ball trajectory, and gameplay context, ensuring that enforcement is not just about contact but also about whether the shot was reckless or avoidable.

See the latest: PPA Mesa Cup Tour 2025 Controversies

Why Now?

The debate over aggressive targeting has been heating up, especially after a controversial moment between Ben Johns and Quang Duong at the PPA Tour Masters. As reported by 11 Pickles, Johns fired a forceful shot at Duong, sparking intense discussion about the ethics of "bodybagging"—the practice of aiming shots at an opponent’s body to force an error.

While some players and fans see bodybagging as a legitimate strategy, others argue that targeting an opponent’s head or upper body crosses the line into dangerous play. The UPA’s rule is an attempt to define that boundary clearly, discouraging reckless aggression while maintaining the competitive nature of the sport.

Jason Aspes, President of UPA-A, stated that this rule is aimed at maintaining the integrity of the sport: "UPA-A is committed to maintaining a game that is fun, fair, and competitive." This reflects the organization's efforts to enhance player safety while ensuring a competitive environment. Jason Aspes also mentioned during discussions that the rule was implemented in response to recent incidents that sparked debates among players about aggressive play and potential safety risks: "Our goal is to foster an environment where players can compete at the highest level without unnecessary risk."

Community Reactions & Concerns

As with any major rule change, reactions from the pickleball community have been mixed:

• Supporters believe this rule is necessary to prevent injuries and encourage fair play. They argue that pickleball should prioritize skill over brute force.
• Critics worry about inconsistent enforcement and the subjective nature of determining intent. Some believe the rule could discourage aggressive play altogether, altering the fast-paced dynamics of professional pickleball.

Additionally, some players argue that the rule’s financial penalties—starting at $2,500—may disproportionately impact lower-ranked professionals compared to top-tier players who can absorb fines more easily.

What’s Next?

The UPA has made it clear that this is a provisional rule, meaning it could evolve based on feedback from players, officials, and fans. Referees will play a crucial role in enforcing the rule consistently, and their decisions could significantly impact match outcomes.

For now, players will need to adjust their strategies, keeping their shots low and avoiding high-velocity hits toward opponents' heads. As the rule takes effect, all eyes will be on how it shapes professional play—and whether it ultimately improves safety without diluting the competitive edge of the game.

11 PICKLES will continue covering this rule’s impact, tracking how enforcement plays out on the pro circuit and how players adapt to this significant change. Stay tuned for more updates as we analyze the evolving landscape of competitive pickleball.